http://dailyhaze.com/update-dog-has-throat-slashed-in-wichita-kansas/
Jen Arevalo Sounds
like a shady story. 1) the dog should have been contained. 2) if the
dog was killed it probably was attacking another animal or human and out
of self defense was killed. 3) if you don't follow the laws and
requirements to have a micro chip/rabies or whatever the law calls for,
DO NOT have an animal! No sympathy here. You sound like an irresponsible
pet owner whining for attention.
Yvonne Banks Williams I
cannot believe some people are really upset about Charlie the pit bull
that got his throat cut when he attack a smaller dog some people have
more compassion about a pit bull that attack, mauled and even kills more
then they do for our children, elders,
adults and other innocent animals 19 months ago my grand daughter got
attack and mauled by two pit bulls some people care more for pit bulls
then they do about a human being life smh:-(
Sarah Howard ?Charley
was left to roam the area without supervision. The neighbor, who Gregg
claimed was responsible, was walking his chihuahua at the time of the
incident. Charley ran up behind the owner’s chihuahua and picked the
smaller dog up by it’s skin. Charley was
said to have the smaller dogs back skin and refused to let go. It was
at that time that the neighbor pulled out a personal knife and stabbed
the dog once. Charley did not respond to the initial stab, so the owner
slashed the dog. Charley dropped the smaller dog and returned to his
house.
This was not a pit bull hate crime. In all actuality, neighbors know Charley for running freely. This neighbor may have had problems with Charley attacking his chihuahua in the past. One thing is for sure, this dog was not just brutally murdered out of nowhere, as Gregg insinuated.
3 comments:
Charlie is a pit bull that does not deserve "justice". When an animal is allowed to run free, there are consequences. If you don't like those consequences, don't allow your animal to run free. It's not rocket science.
I don't want to encounter loose dogs on my walks. There are ordinances in my county that don't allow dogs to run free. I also walk around with a knife. It's become a necessity, thanks to the proliferation of pit bulls in my neighborhood. Does anyone really want to try and defend themselves without weapons when faced with a threatening pit bull? A normal dog, I've done it many times. Normal dogs are easy to fend off. A pit bull? I'll use whatever means I have. I've already conditioned myself where I should stab, and be prepared for blood to make my hands slippery while holding the knife. Do I normally think this way? Nope, but I'll be damned if I'm going to be a victim of a pit bull. I will protect my life and limbs, literally.
Personally, I think breed specific legislation is the more civilized way to deal with pit bulls, but it's been categorically denied in my state. So, I'll take matters into my own hands. Justice for Charlie? Where's my justice? Where's my freedom? Where are my civil liberties?
That picture warms the cockles of my heart. Anon, you hit it on the head. Pit bulls deny us our freedom. I, too, carry a knife. It is a dive safety knife that can be opened with one hand. I used to carry a gun, but it's too heavy, awkward, controversial, and an accident would be more deadly. I know just where to cut to kill, because an attack by pit is life or death. I don't want to kill someone's pet. But I don't want to be a victim, either.
"Please help Charlie get justice." Actually, Charlie already got justice, so what's her problem?
Post a Comment