Jen Arevalo Sounds like a shady story. 1) the dog should have been contained. 2) if the dog was killed it probably was attacking another animal or human and out of self defense was killed. 3) if you don't follow the laws and requirements to have a micro chip/rabies or whatever the law calls for, DO NOT have an animal! No sympathy here. You sound like an irresponsible pet owner whining for attention.
Yvonne Banks Williams I cannot believe some people are really upset about Charlie the pit bull that got his throat cut when he attack a smaller dog some people have more compassion about a pit bull that attack, mauled and even kills more then they do for our children, elders, adults and other innocent animals 19 months ago my grand daughter got attack and mauled by two pit bulls some people care more for pit bulls then they do about a human being life smh:-(
Sarah Howard ?Charley was left to roam the area without supervision. The neighbor, who Gregg claimed was responsible, was walking his chihuahua at the time of the incident. Charley ran up behind the owner’s chihuahua and picked the smaller dog up by it’s skin. Charley was said to have the smaller dogs back skin and refused to let go. It was at that time that the neighbor pulled out a personal knife and stabbed the dog once. Charley did not respond to the initial stab, so the owner slashed the dog. Charley dropped the smaller dog and returned to his house.
This was not a pit bull hate crime. In all actuality, neighbors know Charley for running freely. This neighbor may have had problems with Charley attacking his chihuahua in the past. One thing is for sure, this dog was not just brutally murdered out of nowhere, as Gregg insinuated.